Back to News

Could Maryland Pollution Ruling Soon Affect Pa.?

Published on

March 19, 2021

A Maryland circuit court recently ruled that the Maryland Department of the Environment must regulate ammonia air emissions from livestock operations as a water pollutant.

The court case specifically dealt with ammonia emissions from poultry houses but applies to other livestock operations that are subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) water discharge permits under federal and state statutes in Maryland. The court found that gaseous ammonia is discharged to the Chesapeake Bay through the use of industrial fans, and a 2020 study showed that millions of pounds of ammonia are emitted from Maryland’s poultry industry. The study then showed the emitted ammonia settles on nearby land and waterways, casing significant pollution to the bay.

If the ruling is implemented by Maryland, it would likely result in costly monitoring and mitigation measures by livestock operations to address ammonia emissions for the state’s livestock industry. It is expected that the court’s ruling will be appealed.

Although the Maryland court’s ruling is not directly applicable to Pennsylvania livestock operations, its underlying rationale could serve as a basis for legal actions to regulate agricultural ammonia emissions in Pennsylvania, part of which is also part of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Addressing these emissions could have a significant financial impact on livestock operations, and livestock operations in Pennsylvania may want to start researching this issue now to decide how a similar ruling or law it could affect them if one comes to pass in the state.

If you have any questions about the ammonia emissions in your livestock operation, please contact me.

DISCLAIMER: The information in this alert should not be construed as legal advice to be relied upon nor to create an attorney/client relationship. Please note that the reader’s or an industry’s specific situation or circumstances will vary and, thus, for example, an approach that is advisable in one industry may not be appropriate in another industry. If you have questions about your situation or about how to apply information contained in this alert to your situation or industry, you should reach out to an attorney.

The views expressed in this alert are those of the individual author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm or the firm’s clients. The response to the COVID-19 pandemic is particularly challenging, evolving and, in many cases, can be controversial. Any views expressed in this alert are not intended to advocate for or endorse a particular governmental response to the pandemic.


Related News

View More News
News Alert
April 11, 2024

The Ever-changing Regulatory Landscape and Potential Impacts of PFAS on Businesses 

The ubiquity of PFAS (per and polyfluoalkyl substances), so-called “forev...

Learn More
Press Release
April 8, 2024

Attorneys Latisha Bernard Schuenemann and EmmaRose Strohl selected as Lehigh Valley Business Women of Influence Award Winners

For Immediate Release Reading, Pa. – We are pleased to announce partner L...

Learn More
News Alert
March 11, 2024

Recent Lawsuit Highlights Potential Liabilities Related to PFAS in Sewage Sludge

A recently filed lawsuit filed in Maryland highlights the potential liabili...

Learn More

Other Upcoming Events

View All Upcoming Events
May
02
8:00 am
-
10:30 am
event
Location

Wake Up With Barley – A Morning on Real Estate 2024

Learn More
May
10
12:00 pm
-
5:00 pm
event
Location

Title IX Training: New Regulations & Updates – An Extension of the Employment Law Seminar

Learn More
May
10
8:00 am
-
5:00 pm
event
Location

41st Annual Employment Law Seminar

Learn More

Get in Touch

Our attorneys, paralegals and staff look forward to hearing from you. Please reach out to let us know how we can help.

Get In Touch
RECOGNIZED IN
Super Lawyers
Best Law Firms US News
Best Lawyers