Back to News

Could Maryland Pollution Ruling Soon Affect Pa.?

Published on

March 19, 2021

A Maryland circuit court recently ruled that the Maryland Department of the Environment must regulate ammonia air emissions from livestock operations as a water pollutant.

The court case specifically dealt with ammonia emissions from poultry houses but applies to other livestock operations that are subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) water discharge permits under federal and state statutes in Maryland. The court found that gaseous ammonia is discharged to the Chesapeake Bay through the use of industrial fans, and a 2020 study showed that millions of pounds of ammonia are emitted from Maryland’s poultry industry. The study then showed the emitted ammonia settles on nearby land and waterways, casing significant pollution to the bay.

If the ruling is implemented by Maryland, it would likely result in costly monitoring and mitigation measures by livestock operations to address ammonia emissions for the state’s livestock industry. It is expected that the court’s ruling will be appealed.

Although the Maryland court’s ruling is not directly applicable to Pennsylvania livestock operations, its underlying rationale could serve as a basis for legal actions to regulate agricultural ammonia emissions in Pennsylvania, part of which is also part of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Addressing these emissions could have a significant financial impact on livestock operations, and livestock operations in Pennsylvania may want to start researching this issue now to decide how a similar ruling or law it could affect them if one comes to pass in the state.

If you have any questions about the ammonia emissions in your livestock operation, please contact me.

DISCLAIMER: The information in this alert should not be construed as legal advice to be relied upon nor to create an attorney/client relationship. Please note that the reader’s or an industry’s specific situation or circumstances will vary and, thus, for example, an approach that is advisable in one industry may not be appropriate in another industry. If you have questions about your situation or about how to apply information contained in this alert to your situation or industry, you should reach out to an attorney.

The views expressed in this alert are those of the individual author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm or the firm’s clients. The response to the COVID-19 pandemic is particularly challenging, evolving and, in many cases, can be controversial. Any views expressed in this alert are not intended to advocate for or endorse a particular governmental response to the pandemic.


Related News

View More News
News Alert
November 5, 2026

Barley Snyder Named to Best Law Firms® 2027 Edition in 26 Practice Areas

For Immediate Release Lancaster, Pa. – Barley Snyder is proud to announce that Best Lawyers® has named the firm to its 20...

Learn More
News Alert
October 28, 2026

California’s New Non-Ultraprocessed Seal: Planning Considerations for Food Companies and Retailers

California is creating a voluntary certification program for products that meet state standards concerning ultraprocessed foo...

Learn More
News Alert
September 23, 2026

Food Donations Can Reduce Waste, Support Communities and Preserve Potential Tax Benefits

Food businesses often face the same question: “What should be done with excess, short-dated, cosmetically imperfect, mislab...

Learn More

Get in Touch

Our attorneys, paralegals and staff look forward to hearing from you. Please reach out to let us know how we can help.

Get In Touch
RECOGNIZED IN
Super Lawyers
Best Lawyers