Back to News

PA Supreme Court Enhances Ability of Permit Challengers to Recover Attorney’s Fees from Private Parties

Published on

February 23, 2023

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has made it easier for public interest groups and others challenging clean water permits issued by the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) to recover attorney’s fees and costs from permit applicants. In a decision issued February 22, 2023, the Court struck down a rule imposed by the Environmental Hearing Board (“EHB”) that limited the recovery of attorney fees and costs from private parties to those instances where the applicants acted in bad faith. The Court’s ruling increases the potential that permit applicants must not only bear their own legal costs in defending a permit appeal but may also be required to reimburse parties that challenge clean water permits for their attorney’s fees and costs.

Parties affected by DEP approval or disapproval of permit applications can appeal that action to the EHB. These parties include a permittee (in the case of a permit application disapproval) or parties impacted by a permit approval. The Pennsylvania Clean Streams law allows the EHB to order any party to the appeal to pay costs and attorney’s fees that it determines to have been reasonably incurred by another party to the appeal. The Court’s action reverses a standard established by the EHB that limited the recovery of attorney’s fees and costs against private parties to an appeal to only instances where a private party acted in bad faith or for an improper purpose.

Despite striking down the EHB’s previous standard for awarding fees under the Clean Streams Law, the Court left the EHB with broad discretion to decide when to award attorney’s fees and costs, based upon the facts of individual appeals. That said, permit applicants now face an increased risk of footing the legal expenses of parties challenging their permits. These expenses can run in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. There are steps, however, that permit applicants can take to minimize this risk. The most important measure is for those seeking permits from DEP to submit high quality permit applications. This means working closely with environmental consultants, and environmental counsel when necessary, when preparing permit applications. This is particularly true for projects that may be controversial or subject to heightened public scrutiny. Failure to do so could lead not only to a denial of a permit application by DEP but payment of opposing parties’ legal expenses. High quality permit applications not only increase the potential that DEP will take timely favorable actions, it also increases the odds that the approvals will withstand challenges.

The case is Clean Air Council v. DEP.

If you have any questions pertaining to the latest court ruling or changes to permit applications, please contact me or anyone in the Barley Snyder Environment & Energy Industry Group.

Related News

View More News
News Alert
March 14, 2023

New ASTM Standard Recognized by U.S. EPA for Phase 1 Reports Now in Effect

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) took final action to amend t...

Learn More
Press Release
March 8, 2023

Barley Snyder Partner Justin Tomevi Admitted to Practice in the District of Columbia

For Immediate Release York, Pa. – Barley Snyder is pleased to announce th...

Learn More
February 28, 2023

Barley Snyder 2022 Year In Review

Check out what the professionals of Barley Snyder have been up to in 2022 a...

Learn More

Other Upcoming Events

View All Upcoming Events
12:00 pm
1:00 pm

Bank Regulation & Failure: A Discussion on Current Events in the Banking Industry

Learn More
12:00 pm
6:00 pm

LendiCon 2023

Learn More
8:00 am
4:45 pm

40th Annual Employment Law Seminar

Learn More

Get in Touch

Our attorneys, paralegals and staff look forward to hearing from you. Please reach out to let us know how we can help.

Get In Touch
Super Lawyers
Best Law Firms US News
Best Lawyers